June 19, 2013
Protests in Brazil

A report by The Guardian on protests in Brazil. The video clip shows what  probably all news agencies think people want to see - people chanting and the police over-reacting - but the print report mentions what Brazil’s president said - she probably is a fellow reader of Machiavelli’s Discourses  - and goes on to discuss the real reasons for most demonstrations - corruption in high places and maldistribution of wealth: 

Brazil Protests Catch Authorities on the Back Foot

“Although police in some regions cracked down hard, President Dilma Rousseff praised the marchers.

Brazil woke up stronger today,” Rousseff said in a televised speech on Tuesday. “The size of yesterday’s demonstrations shows the energy of our democracy, the strength of the voice of the streets and the civility of our population.’

[A demonstrator said] “I joined because I’m tired of the corruption in Brazil. There’s so many wrong things and nobody does anything. We will host the World Cup, but we don’t have a decent public transport, for example. Now I’m feeling extremely happy because I think the citizens discovered that something can be done.” .  .  .   While football is almost a religion in Brazil, the World Cup has focused resentment on a range of issues, as people question why such huge sums are being spent on stadiums for an international event, when the country still lacks basic healthcare and education for millions of its citizens.

During the protests, placards, graffiti and chants focused on social inequality, a shortage of doctors and teachers, shoddy public infrastructure, corruption, evictions for the World Cup and Olympics, overspends on stadiums and widespread frustration that – 28 years after the dictatorship and 10 years since the Workers’ party took power – Brazil is still being run on behalf of an elite.”

June 18, 2013
Demonstrations - Syria versus Turkey

According to Machiavelli, peaceful demonstrations are a strength of a representative democracy. They are a signal to the ruling elites that they have gone too far in accumulating wealth and suppressing the rights of the working classes. A representative democracy such as Turkey has legal mechanisms to initiate reform and elect new leaders if needed.  Syria is a dictatorship and peaceful demonstrations like those occurring  in 2011 could not lead to reform because the very existence of the  dictatorship is usually dependent on  corruption.

Demonstrations are continuing in Turkey. We will see whether the government responds in a constructive way or forcefully suppresses the demonstrations, a path that usually leads in the longer term  to violence and instability.

Riots are another story. They are usually a reaction to government force and have no agenda or organization. Rioters can destroy but they lack the organization needed to create or build. From a previous post on this blog:

Over the past century, crowd theory has become more sophisticated. An interesting article by Clark McPhail, emeritus professor of sociology at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, A Sociological Primer on Crowd Control,  is the best analysis I came across. He notes for example that a mob is composed for the most part of small groups, friends or relatives, and that these small groups tend to act together though the mob as a whole acts in a disorganized fashion. He suggests that police who are planning to take aggressive action announce their intentions and at the same time offer the small groups composing the mob an exit route as many of them are spectators and an appeal to the protective instincts of group members may be helpful in avoiding violence. Worth reading.

June 17, 2013
Job Destruction

Interesting article from MIT describing how jobs are being destroyed by computerization and robots. The article describes a steady climb in productivity since 2000 but flat work force growth. We are apparently just at the beginning of a revolution that will make many workers unnecessary.

I mentioned previously that the NY Times printed a heads up in an article a month ago that suggested that tech corporations are one of the major driving forces behind the  immigration bill currently before Congress. If the bill is passed into law, corporations will have the ability to legally fire American workers without cause and replace them with skilled foreign workers on temporary visas. This will drive down wages and increase the trend towards elimination of benefits for American workers. The Times in a June 16, 2013 editorial stated the following [excerpted]:

“There is a durable belief that much of today’s unemployment is rooted in a skills gap, in which good jobs go unfilled for lack of qualified applicants. This is mostly a corporate fiction, based in part on self-interest and a misreading of government data..  .  .

“If a business really needed workers, it would pay up. .  .  .  Employers may be posting openings, but they are not trying all that hard to fill them, say, by increasing job ads or offering better pay packages..  .  .

“Corporate executives have valuable perspectives on the economy, but they also have an interest in promoting the notion of a skills gap. They want schools and, by extension, the government to take on more of the costs of training workers .  .  . They also want more immigration, both low and high skilled, because immigrants may be willing to work for less than their American counterparts.”

The Times is to be commended for bringing up the fact that while politicians blather about  massive education programs for the unemployed and the urgent need for massive importation of technical workers, that they are obfuscating the real problem of progressive job scarcity.

Liked posts on Tumblr: More liked posts »